Ok, time to vote.

Pick your preference of rating, in a fortnight I'll implement the winner.

I'm not endorsing any particular scheme, but I might have the casting vote at the end. Only one vote per person, and you cannot change your mind once your vote is cast.
The winning suggestor can pick the ranks.

Just to save you looking them up.....


Steve's suggestion:

Steve wrote:

How about: 0 = Doesn't know how to turn a computor on, 1 - 10 = Has a life outside Forums, 11 - 100 = Loosing the ability of old fashioned face-to-face conversations 101 + = just too much time on your hands

Bob's suggestion of Bike capacity:

missile wrote:

What about bikes of increasing capacity for increasing number of posts? Honda CB50, through BSA Bantam 125, right up to a Boss Hog

Nikki's bike related suggestions:

Nikki wrote:

something like 'visor licker' up to 'king of the road'

Phil's Bike Make:

Phil Littler wrote:

maybe lowest rating being some sort of BMW and highest maybe a Kawasaki

...I'm detecting a bit of bias there...

_________________
Ali

ps, mine wasn't a suggestion, more an observation

Got to be the Wombles......Underground, overground, wombling free......the Wombles of Wimbledon Common are we.....

Got to be the Wombles......Underground, overground, wombling free......the Wombles of Wimbledon Common are we.....

Voting is over.

It was a tight race to the end, but with a lead of only 3 votes , Missile's suggestion of bike capacity has won through.

Ratings will be implemented... soon.

Is it purely on size, or how well it is used?